NEUTRA |Revista del Colegio Oficial de Arquitectos de Sevilla ISSN 1138-1507
Rehabilitar, reconvertir, revitalizar pero mantener el puerto en la ciudad.
Autores/as
Joan ALemany
Palabras clave:
la renovación de los waterfronts, imitación y banalización, bien escaso, especial y de alto valor, privatización, sostenibilidad, actividades marítimas, vida urbana
Resumen
The urban planning experiences of lhe decades of the 8 0 S and 9 0S during the XXth
Century marked the two main objectives of the phenomenon known as waterfront renovation projects: urban
renewal and socio-economic development. The proposals opened up abandoned areas in the centre of the
city to urban life, providing them with services and public facilities, obtaining greal acceptance,
regardless of the quality of architecture, urban design or the level of services and activities. These
interventions characterised some guidelines which were imitated in many other port cilies, trivialising
contents and forms. One of the most frequent mistakes is not taking into consideration maritime
activities. In these cases, generally speaking , the result has been negative when altering spaces with
maritime tradition and vocation. From a sustainable alternative, in the transformation of port spaces,
it is always necessary to contemplate firstly the possibility of maintaining maritime and terrestrial
activities, without the privatisation of these spaces. The dock can include marinas and installations
for the practice of nautical sports, passenger traffic, tourist cruises, traditional fishing, the
docking of historic and scientific vessels. On land, specialised installations will be necessary for
maritime activities which can be complemented with cultural centres, services buildings, commercial and
tourist areas, and scientific o r information centres focused on the sea. Public spaces should structure
and relate all the services and facilities as well as the urban relationship between the city and its
port. The main objective is to keep the port in the city, revitalising it with new activities and
facilities, without changing its character, as this always entails a loss of identity and heritage as
well as a waste of new opportunities for the future development of our old port cities.